GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 31% cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.80
Output price / 1M$1.25$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.40
Context window1M128K
Max output131K115K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-182025-02-01
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 31% cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons