GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.36 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 37% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.36
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.37
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M33K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182024-09-19
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 37% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ≈ $920.00.

More comparisons