GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Meta
$0.10 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Meta
Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 4.7× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 FlashXMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.10
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.002
Context window1M1M
Max output131K944K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182026-09-02
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 4.7× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons