GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.32
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 3.8× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.10
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.32
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.16
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M131K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index11.9
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182024-12-06
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 3.8× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ≈ $360.00.

More comparisons