GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Tencent

Hunyuan A13B Instruct

Tencent
$0.14 / $0.57
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Tencent
Verdict: Hunyuan A13B Instruct is 2.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXHunyuan A13B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.14
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.57
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.25
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M131K
Max output131K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-182025-07-08
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?

Hunyuan A13B Instruct is 2.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Hunyuan A13B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Hunyuan A13B Instruct ≈ $565.00.

More comparisons