GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Nous Research

Hermes 3 70B Instruct

Nous Research
$0.70 / $0.70
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Nous Research
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 16% cheaper than Hermes 3 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXHermes 3 70B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.70
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.70
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.70
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M131K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-182024-08-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Hermes 3 70B Instruct?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 16% cheaper than Hermes 3 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Hermes 3 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Hermes 3 70B Instruct ≈ $1,750.

More comparisons