GLM 4.7 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 4.7 Flash is 27.5× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
| GLM 4.7 Flash | Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0605 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.40 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.15 | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.20 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 118K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.5 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 23 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2026-10-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
GLM 4.7 Flash is 27.5× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 4.7 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 4.7 Flash: 200,000 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.7 Flash ≈ $321.00, Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
GLM 4.7 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 4.7 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 4.7 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 4.7 Flash vs Hy4GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 4.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 4.7 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 4.7 Flash vs Mistral Large 4GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 CarbonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro