DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 4.7 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0605 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 4.7 Flash is 1% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.0605
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M200K
Max output393K118K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-01-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash is 1% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 4.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash: 200,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, GLM 4.7 Flash ≈ $321.00.

More comparisons