Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 4.7 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0605 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 4.7 Flash is 27% cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.0605
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M200K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-01-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash is 27% cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 4.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash: 200,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, GLM 4.7 Flash ≈ $321.00.

More comparisons