Gemma 3 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemma 3 27B

Google
$0.08 / $0.35
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
NVIDIA
Verdict: Gemma 3 27B is 36% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Gemma 3 27BNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.08$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.35$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.02
Context window131K1M
Max output118K944K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index10.1—
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-03-122026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Gemma 3 27B is 36% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemma 3 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Gemma 3 27B: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 3 27B ≈ $335.00, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons