Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemma 3 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Gemma 3 27B

Google
$0.08 / $0.35
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Google
Verdict: Gemma 3 27B is 108.5× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.2Gemma 3 27B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.08
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.35
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.04
Context window1M131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index—10.1
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072025-03-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is 108.5× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemma 3 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemma 3 27B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Gemma 3 27B ≈ $335.00.

More comparisons