Gemma 3 27B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemma 3 27B

Google
$0.08 / $0.45
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: Gemma 3 27B is 17.4× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (14.2 vs 4.9). Mistral Medium 3.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemma 3 27BMistral Medium 3.5
Input price / 1M$0.08$1.50
Output price / 1M$0.45$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.17$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.04
Context window131K262K
Max output118K210K
Intelligence index4.914.2
Coding index10.146.9
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-03-122026-04-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemma 3 27B is 17.4× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemma 3 27B vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?

Gemma 3 27B: 131,072 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 3 27B ≈ $385.00, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons