Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 19.4× cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.75 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $3.75 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.50 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.075 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 8K |
| Max output | 66K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 34 | — |
| Coding index | 69.2 | — |
| Providers | 7 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 19.4× cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 3.6 Flash ≈ $3,375, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemini 3.6 Flash vs Command A+Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemini 3.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.7Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemini 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5