Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.8× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.56$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window66K131K
Max output59K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers21
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoNo
Released2026-06-302026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.8× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ≈ $1,250, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons