Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 3.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.10
Output price / 1M$1.50$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.56$0.15
Cached input / 1M
Context window66K1.3M
Max output59K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index8.2
Providers23
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-302025-04-05
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 3.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ≈ $1,250, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons