Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.4× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.15
Output price / 1M$1.50$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.56$0.23
Cached input / 1M—$0.02
Context window66K1M
Max output59K944K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index——
Providers210
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-302026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.4× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ≈ $1,250, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons