Fugu Max vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

S

Fugu Max

Sakana
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
S
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 15.0× cheaper than Fugu Max on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Fugu Max has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Fugu MaxNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$6.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.25
Context window1M131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-112026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Fugu Max or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 15.0× cheaper than Fugu Max on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Fugu Max vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Fugu Max: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Fugu Max ≈ $7,000, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons