ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

B

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Baidu
$0.42 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
B
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 3.1× cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 123K).
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.42$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.63$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window123K131K
Max output16K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoNo
Released2025-06-302026-06-04
Retirement2026-10-08

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 3.1× cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B : 123,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B ≈ $1,465, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons