ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Baidu
$0.42 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Baidu
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 6% cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 123K).
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B GLM 5.3 FlashX
Input price / 1M$0.42$0.37
Output price / 1M$1.25$1.25
Blended price (3:1)$0.63$0.59
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window123K1M
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-06-302026-09-18
Retirement2026-10-08

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B or GLM 5.3 FlashX?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 6% cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B : 123,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B ≈ $1,465, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.

More comparisons