Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 26.1× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Ember-1 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.02 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 13.6 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 10 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 26.1× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonEmber-1 vs Claude Fable 5.2Ember-1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashEmber-1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashEmber-1 vs Hy4Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalEmber-1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraEmber-1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProEmber-1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProEmber-1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ember-1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonEmber-1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ember-1 vs Nano Banana 2.1Ember-1 vs Mistral Large 4Ember-1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Hy4Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 TerraNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro