Ember-1 vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 40.0× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
| Ember-1 | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 944K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 40.0× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonEmber-1 vs Claude Fable 5.2Ember-1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashEmber-1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashEmber-1 vs Hy4Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalEmber-1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraEmber-1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProEmber-1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProEmber-1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLEmber-1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonEmber-1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ember-1 vs Nano Banana 2.1Ember-1 vs Mistral Large 4Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Hy4Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro