DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.32
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 26% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.42$0.32
Blended price (3:1)$0.21$0.16
Cached input / 1M$0.0042
Context window1M131K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index39.5
Coding index11.9
Providers26
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102024-12-06
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 26% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ≈ $360.00.

More comparisons