DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.022 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.05 / $0.33
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Meta Llama
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 3% cheaper than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.022$0.05
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.33
Blended price (3:1)$0.12$0.12
Cached input / 1M$0.004—
Context window1M131K
Max output944K118K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers36—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-102024-09-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 3% cheaper than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ≈ $265.00.

More comparisons