DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.05 / $0.33
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
M
Verdict: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 43% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.05
Output price / 1M$0.42$0.33
Blended price (3:1)$0.21$0.12
Cached input / 1M$0.0042
Context window1M131K
Max output131K118K
Intelligence index39.5
Coding index
Providers26
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-102024-09-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 43% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ≈ $265.00.

More comparisons