DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.045 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Liquid

LFM2.5-2.6B

Liquid
$0.35 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Liquid
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 2.4× cheaper than LFM2.5-2.6B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLFM2.5-2.6B
Input price / 1M$0.045$0.35
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.16$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.006$0.04
Context window1M128K
Max output944K8K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—7.7
Providers40—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-08-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or LFM2.5-2.6B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 2.4× cheaper than LFM2.5-2.6B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. LFM2.5-2.6B: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $340.00, LFM2.5-2.6B ≈ $950.00.

More comparisons