DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 13.3× cheaper than GLM 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 205K).
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GLM 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.022 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.40 | $3.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.12 | $1.55 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.004 | $0.20 |
| Context window | 1M | 205K |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 36 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-10 | 2026-02-11 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 13.3× cheaper than GLM 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5: 204,800 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00, GLM 5 ≈ $3,600.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5 vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5 vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5 vs Hy4GLM 5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5 vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro