DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.10 / $0.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.0× cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.90
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.30
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.025
Context window1M262K
Max output393K236K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—41.9
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-04-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.0× cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $650.00.

More comparisons