DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.098 / $0.29

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.12 / $0.80

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.0× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Qwen3 Coder Next
Input price / 1M	$0.098	$0.12
Output price / 1M	$0.29	$0.80
Blended price (3:1)	$0.15	$0.29
Cached input / 1M	$0.0029	$0.07
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	393K	236K
Intelligence index	28.6	—
Coding index	—	36.2
Providers	47	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-02-04
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.0× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 Coder Next: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen3 Coder Next ≈ $640.00.

More comparisons