DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ministral 3 3B 2512

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Mistral AI

Ministral 3 3B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.10 / $0.10
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Mistral AI
Verdict: Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 32% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ministral 3 3B 2512
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.10
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.10
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.01
Context window1M131K
Max output393K105K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—4.8
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172025-12-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Ministral 3 3B 2512?

Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 32% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ministral 3 3B 2512: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Ministral 3 3B 2512: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Ministral 3 3B 2512 ≈ $250.00.

More comparisons