DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi
$4.35 / $8.70
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Xiaomi
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 37.0× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Input price / 1M$0.098$4.35
Output price / 1M$0.29$8.70
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$5.44
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.036
Context window1M1M
Max output393K131K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers471
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 37.0× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050.

More comparisons