DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.71 / $0.71
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Meta Llama
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.8× cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.71
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.71
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.71
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.71
Context window1M131K
Max output393K115K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—11.9
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172024-12-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.8× cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ≈ $1,775.

More comparisons