DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 39% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.06
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.012
Context window1M131K
Max output393K33K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—57
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-09-10
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 39% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons