DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.098 / $0.29

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro

OpenAI

$0.20 / $1.20

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.1× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-5.6 Luna Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	GPT-5.6 Luna Pro
Input price / 1M	$0.098	$0.20
Output price / 1M	$0.29	$1.20
Blended price (3:1)	$0.15	$0.45
Cached input / 1M	$0.0029	$0.02
Context window	1M	1.1M
Max output	393K	128K
Intelligence index	28.6	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	47	5
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-07-09
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-5.6 Luna Pro?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.1× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna Pro: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro ≈ $1,000.

More comparisons