DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5V Turbo

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.098 / $0.29

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

GLM 5V Turbo

Z.ai (Zhipu)

$1.20 / $4.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 12.9× cheaper than GLM 5V Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 203K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	GLM 5V Turbo
Input price / 1M	$0.098	$1.20
Output price / 1M	$0.29	$4.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.15	$1.90
Cached input / 1M	$0.0029	$0.24
Context window	1M	203K
Max output	393K	131K
Intelligence index	28.6	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	47	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-04-01
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 5V Turbo?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 12.9× cheaper than GLM 5V Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5V Turbo: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5V Turbo: 202,752 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, GLM 5V Turbo ≈ $4,400.

More comparisons