DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$1.00 / $3.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 10.5× cheaper than GLM 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 205K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5
Input price / 1M$0.098$1.00
Output price / 1M$0.29$3.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$1.55
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.20
Context window1M205K
Max output393K131K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-02-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 5?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 10.5× cheaper than GLM 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5: 204,800 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, GLM 5 ≈ $3,600.

More comparisons