DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Google
$0.08 / $0.10
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Google
Verdict: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 42% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemma 4 26B A4B
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.10
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.085
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.046
Context window1M262K
Max output393K128K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—39.3
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-04-03
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Gemma 4 26B A4B ?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is 42% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B : which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Gemma 4 26B A4B ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons