DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B

Baidu
$0.42 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Baidu
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.3× cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 123K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.42
Output price / 1M$0.29$1.25
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.63
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M123K
Max output393K16K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172025-06-30
Retirement—2026-10-08

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B ?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.3× cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B : which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B : 123,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B ≈ $1,465.

More comparisons