DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

DeepSeek
$0.94 / $1.88
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 13.1× cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (30.4 vs 24.6). DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.94$0.06
Output price / 1M$1.88$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$1.17$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.0783$0.012
Context window1M262K
Max output384K33K
Intelligence index30.424.6
Coding index59.457
Providers16
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-04-242026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 13.1× cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 ≈ $2,819, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons