DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM 5.3

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

DeepSeek

$0.46 / $1.39

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

GLM 5.3

Z.ai (Zhipu)

$0.84 / $2.64

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 46% cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (44.8 vs 36). GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813	GLM 5.3
Input price / 1M	$0.46	$0.84
Output price / 1M	$1.39	$2.64
Blended price (3:1)	$0.69	$1.29
Cached input / 1M	$0.0154	$0.16
Context window	1M	1.3M
Max output	384K	131K
Intelligence index	36	44.8
Coding index	68.8	74.8
Providers	24	34
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	No	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-08-12	2026-08-18
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GLM 5.3?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is 46% cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM 5.3: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ≈ $1,617, GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM 5.3