DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs ReMM SLERP 13B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.0434 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

ReMM SLERP 13B

Undi95
$0.30 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
U
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 3.3× cheaper than ReMM SLERP 13B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1M vs 6K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731ReMM SLERP 13B
Input price / 1M$0.0434$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.35
Cached input / 1M$0.035$0.20
Context window1M6K
Max output944K6K
Intelligence index——
Coding index69.1—
Providers27—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-07-312023-07-22
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or ReMM SLERP 13B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 3.3× cheaper than ReMM SLERP 13B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs ReMM SLERP 13B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens. ReMM SLERP 13B: 6,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $236.80, ReMM SLERP 13B ≈ $850.00.

More comparisons