DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.03 / $0.32
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.66 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
Q
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 7.3× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 33K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.03$0.66
Output price / 1M$0.32$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.10$0.74
Cached input / 1M$0.016
Context window1.3M33K
Max output944K29K
Intelligence index34.3
Coding index69.1
Providers30
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-07-312024-11-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 7.3× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $220.00, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ≈ $1,820.

More comparisons