DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.0434 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.66 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 6.9× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.0434$0.66
Output price / 1M$0.30$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.74
Cached input / 1M$0.035—
Context window1M33K
Max output944K29K
Intelligence index——
Coding index69.1—
Providers27—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-07-312024-11-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 6.9× cheaper than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $236.80, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ≈ $1,820.

More comparisons