DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.0434 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 3.4× cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Ling 3.0 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.0434$0.021
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.063
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.0315
Cached input / 1M$0.035$0.0042
Context window1M262K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index——
Coding index69.150.6
Providers27—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-312026-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 3.4× cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $236.80, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.

More comparisons