DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Granite 4.2 8B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

DeepSeek
$0.27 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
I
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 4.2× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (14.8 vs 11.1). DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has the larger context window (164K vs 131K).
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGranite 4.2 8B
Input price / 1M$0.27$0.06
Output price / 1M$1.00$0.25
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.14$0.015
Context window164K131K
Max output33K118K
Intelligence index14.811.1
Coding index43.522.4
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-09-222026-08-31
Retirement2026-09-28

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is 4.2× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Granite 4.2 8B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ≈ $1,040, Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00.

More comparisons