R1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.2× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| R1 0528 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.15 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.91 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.35 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.2% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-05-28 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.2× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 0528 ≈ $2,075, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 0528 vs Command A+R1 0528 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 0528 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 0528 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 0528 vs GPT-6 SolR1 0528 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 0528 vs Grok 4.7R1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 0528 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 0528 vs GPT-6 Astra ProR1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5