Claude Haiku 5.5 vs R1 0528

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

R1 0528

DeepSeek
$0.50 / $2.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 4.6× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
Claude Haiku 5.5R1 0528
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.50
Output price / 1M$0.50$2.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.91
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.35
Context window1M164K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072025-05-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or R1 0528?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 4.6× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs R1 0528: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. R1 0528: 163,840 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, R1 0528 ≈ $2,075.

More comparisons