R1 0528 vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 6.1× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 164K).
| R1 0528 | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.15 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.91 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.35 | — |
| Context window | 164K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-05-28 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 6.1× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 0528 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 0528 ≈ $2,075, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 0528 vs Command A+R1 0528 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 0528 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 0528 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 0528 vs GPT-6 SolR1 0528 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 0528 vs Grok 4.7R1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 0528 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 0528 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5