R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 18.4× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| R1 0528 | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.0399 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.15 | $0.0784 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.91 | $0.0495 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.35 | $0.03 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 27.8 |
| Coding index | — | 71.5 |
| Providers | — | 42 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-05-28 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 18.4× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 0528 ≈ $2,075, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.
More comparisons
R1 0528 vs Gemini 4 CarbonR1 0528 vs Claude Fable 5.2R1 0528 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashR1 0528 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashR1 0528 vs Hy4R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalR1 0528 vs GPT-6.1 TerraR1 0528 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProR1 0528 vs Kimi K3.1 ProR1 0528 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashR1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017R1 0528 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLR1 0528 vs Gemini 4 ArgonR1 0528 vs Claude Haiku 5.5R1 0528 vs Nano Banana 2.1R1 0528 vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro