DeepSeek V3.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.4× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| DeepSeek V3.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.25 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.95 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.42 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.13 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-21 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.4× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V3.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3.1: 163,840 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 ≈ $975.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V3.1 vs Command A+DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 SolDeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V3.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedDeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4.7DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashDeepSeek V3.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXDeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 AstraDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProDeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5