DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Sol
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: DeepSeek V3.1 is 9.4× cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M vs 164K).
| DeepSeek V3.1 | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.25 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.95 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.42 | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.13 | $0.20 |
| Context window | 164K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 33K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | — | 47.5 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-21 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or GPT-6 Sol?
DeepSeek V3.1 is 9.4× cheaper than GPT-6 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Sol: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3.1: 163,840 tokens. GPT-6 Sol: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 ≈ $975.00, GPT-6 Sol ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V3.1 vs Command A+DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProDeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V3.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedDeepSeek V3.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4.7DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashDeepSeek V3.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXDeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 AstraDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProDeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GPT-6 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Sol vs Command A+GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed