DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: DeepSeek V3.1 is 7.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| DeepSeek V3.1 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.25 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.95 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.42 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.13 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 45.4 |
| Coding index | — | 76.2 |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-21 | 2026-09-03 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
DeepSeek V3.1 is 7.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3.1: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 ≈ $975.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V3.1 vs Command A+DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 SolDeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V3.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedDeepSeek V3.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4.7DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashDeepSeek V3.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXDeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 AstraDeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5