Command A vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 29.2× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 256K).
| Command A | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 8K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | — |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 8.2 |
| Providers | 1 | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 29.2× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5