Command A vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 29.2× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 256K).
| Command A | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 8K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | 1 | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 29.2× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs Gemini 4 CarbonCommand A vs Claude Fable 5.2Command A vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashCommand A vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashCommand A vs Hy4Command A vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalCommand A vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A vs Mistral Large 4Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Hy4Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro